interdisciplinary
multi media communications
about
our surveys of net art events, workshop links of nmk and comtemporary art
sites will be extended to you on line
if you contact us
31.1.2000
the newmediakitchen <spq@turk.net>
(nmk-atölye)
will e-mail you at random times
/
you
must please check our programs in situ both at tünel and on the web
site and throughout our below prepared list o f more interesting information
sources...when we searched throughout the sources for " art discussions
and john cage" -
one hit back return result was the following - quite with minimum sympathy
with art discussions
The
PROGRESSIVE POPULIST web site has moved. Please change your
links to our
new URL: http://www.populist.com.
Thanks for your interest in The Progressive Populist,
soon to expand to twice monthly publication.
"We believe that people are more important than corporations."
so
the problem is to be progressive and/or retrogressive and populist at one
same time...
hyperacting
and interlinking with such guidance and staying within dense artistic
premises will certainly ascertain gradually an alternative cyberspace
more in touch with the earth
what
is postmodernism?
Larry
Solomon
"Postmodernism"
is a concept in flux. The nature and description of postmodernism has changed
over the past few decades as the movement has developed. Scholars dedicated
to the subject generally do not agree on a definition. Very
different concepts have been proposed in deconstructionist theory (Derrida,
Lacan), politics (Foucault), social theory (Baudrillard), architecture
(Jencks), literature (Barthes), philosophy (Rorty), etc.
Some of these theories are European in origin and reflect on what is primarily
an American phenomenon, where the practice is focused. The result has been
a mishmash of deconstructivist verbiage that is barely comprehensible,
even to those who are considered be postmodern practitioners.
I do not
intend to launch into a critique of the literature or even a summary of
it, since it is only likely to confuse rather than illuminate. Instead,
I hope to give a simplified and straightforward view of some basic concepts
that have made us aware that we are no longer living in the Modern age,
with a modernist aesthetic. Modernism has become a relic of the past. Thus,
"we
are living in a new world, a world that does not know how to define itself
by what it is, but only by what it has ceased to be".Something
new and different is going on, and because the practice is yet evolving,
it is difficult to define. This
change of paradigm is what is now called "postmodernism", which has become
the accepted rubric.
The paradigm
shift of postmodernism was seeded by two potent factors: 1.
a disenchantment with Enlightenment dogma, and 2. an emerging global culture.
The Enlightenment,
an era of faith in reason and science as the source of truth, began with
the Renaissance and reached its last phase in modernism of the early twentieth
century. The focus of power during this period turned away from the Church
to an aristocracy and monarchs who served, on the one hand, as the patrons
of the arts, and on the other as masters and conquerors. They
supported a line of social and scientific theories from Kant and Hegel
to Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. The last pronounced that God was dead, and
that a race of supermen were destined to rule the world.
These and other ideas, such as Darwinian evolution, the "survival of the
fittest", and racism, were applied to social theory and fed an increasing
aristocratic arrogance that led to European imperialism, colonialism, and
two World Wars.
The modern
age of the early twentieth century was the final stage of the European
Enlightenment. It represented the culmination of centuries of "progress",
knowledge, and culture, The Enlightened world was a world ruled by monarchs
and dictators enforcing a class system and a belief in the progress of
civilization from "primitive" beginnings. It was a time of reductive science
and master codes, an age of exploration, conquest, imperialism, and colonization.
Conquest came to be justified as a part of the natural principle of "the
survival of the fittest". The children of the Enlightenment embraced a
belief in a Newtonian world that would be determined and mastered completely
when or if only our powers of deduction and induction were applied to the
fullest, and if only we could remain objective and detached. Abstract theories
were superior to subjective observations. Every effect had a cause, and
every thing had a reason. The universe was a huge deterministic machine
created by a single god, the Christian god.
The twentieth
century, which is often claimed to be the most civilized ever, was, instead,
the cruelest and bloodiest in human history.
Over fifty million lives were destroyed by World War II alone. An atomic
bomb was built that enabled destruction on an unprecendented scale, on
the order of tens to hundreds of thousands of people in a single blow,
rather than the relative few who were killed in previous wars. Such was
the culmination of an Enlightened world. Both World Wars were instigated
by haughty dictators and conquerers who believed their "race" was superior
to all others, that they deserved a greater share of the world, or even
the world itself. The second war was begun by a dictator whose rule was
so monstrous that no other can even remotely claim to have led to so many
deaths. Yet he was followed and supported by a nation of people who were
considered to be at the peak of Western civilization.
The world
that led to these catastrophes came to an end after the two bloodiest wars
in human history. Empires fell. Dictators and monarchs were deposed. Colonialism
ended. The faith in authority had been shaken, as it was in elitist posturing,
in hierarchical class systems, and in the idea of progress itself. Even
science was changed. This was the beginning of perhaps the biggest paradigm
shift in human history, the beginning of the postmodern world, which was,
in part, due to a reaction against the previous paradigm, represented by
modernism.
In postmodern
science the human observer has become a necessary player. Science is now
looked upon as another creation of the human mind, subjective rather than
an objective abstraction of some external reality. Thus, it is participatory
rather than detached. Art, too, has turned from abstraction to representation,
from control to indeterminacy and chaos, to a preference for communication
and participation. Logic does not rule supreme in the postmodern world.
Instead, a new spiritual dimension has been revived, e.g., in the New Age
movement, a revival of interest in astrology, ESP, etc. Postmodern
art has accepted the past as just as valid as the present, that we haven't
progressed to a better world. Thus, instead of rejecting the past, it is
incorporated into art.
There
is no longer faith in a single over-all embracing metanarrative or consistency
of style and idea, but rather postmodernism embraces the eclectic. There
is greater trust in humor and irony and less in staid and serious theorizing.
Postmodernism reflects an emerging global perspective, of differing cultures
living together on a single planet (pluralism, multi-culturalism), and
an acceptance of these differences, each as valid as the other. Postmodernism
validates the nonintentional. It validates polytheism and a concern for
the environment, ecology. It has turned from the theoretical to the pragmatic,
from uniformity to diversity. and from elitism to populism.
Perhaps
the first awareness of postmodernism was in the field of architecture.
It is in architecture that the multifarious manifestations of postmodernism
are most clearly visible and, therefore, most easily described. In architecture,
postmodernism is a comparative concept, as it is in general, and therefore
it must be contrasted with modernism. Postmodernism is not the opposite
of modernism, as it is often portrayed, but is rather broader, more inclusive,
and encompasses modernism within it. Charles Jencks, perhaps the foremost
spokeperson on postmodernism architecture describes it as "double coding";
i.e., it is modern architecture with something else juxtaposed on it. This
"something else" is not an amalgamation but must be contrasting, eclecticthis
is often a historicist juxtaposition (something from the past), but may
also be from a different culture; e.g., Western + Japanese, or a different
aesthetic. As such, postmodernism seems to represent a period of transition,
a period in which a uniform aesthetic has not yet matured.
Dates
can only be artificial divisions, but they are useful as guidelines. Modern
music is generally considered to be a period from about 1910 to 1960, with
1960-70 being a transitional stage. Modern composers include Schoenberg,
Bartok, Varese, and Stravinsky. Postmodern composers include John Zorn,
and Frank Zappa. But, Charles Ives was, in some ways, a proto-postmodernist
who lived early in the century, which demonstrates that dates cannot be
relied upon completely. On the other hand, modernism survives today as
late-modernism, with such composers as Pierre Boulez, Milton Babbitt, and
Karlheinz Stockhausen.
Modern
artists include Piet Mondrian, Paul Klee, Juan Miro, Pablo Picasso, William
de Kooning, and Mark Rothko. Postmodern artists include Peter Blake, Ron
Kitaj, and Robert Longo. Postmodern architects
include Charles Moore (Piazza d'Italia), Michael Graves (Portland Public
Service Building), and Yasufumi Kijima (Matsuo Shrine). Modern science
is represented by Einstein's relativity and unified field theories. Postmodern
science includes quantum theory, indeterminacy, and chaos.
The following
chart, garnered from various sources with some additions, is meant to contrast
modernism with postmodernism, but any such chart is bound to be an oversimplified
generalization. Nevertheless, distinctions are necessary and useful. This
is offered as such. The contrasts between the two are rarely clear-cut,
and postmodern thought normally embraces modernism within it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
authoritarian,
totalitarian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
non-patriarchal,
feminism
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
non-totalized,
fragmented
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
separation
from and control of nature
|
-
ecological,
harmonious with nature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
intentional,
constructive
|
-
non-intentional,
deconstrucive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
simplicity,
elegance, spartan
|
|
|
|
|
-
Newtonian
mechanics, Relativity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
nonhistoricist,
cult of the "new"
-
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and below.... this is a gif
anim ad demo for gempa in istanbul 090 212 2871717

|